Because the TRO expires 2 days after the Feb 12 preliminary injunction hearing, the judge is giving notice that he will issue a more-permanent decision on or before the TRO expires. He is moving damn fast while ensuring that the parties have the minimum notice and opportunity to make their arguments. Judge is being careful so there is no…
Because the TRO expires 2 days after the Feb 12 preliminary injunction hearing, the judge is giving notice that he will issue a more-permanent decision on or before the TRO expires. He is moving damn fast while ensuring that the parties have the minimum notice and opportunity to make their arguments. Judge is being careful so there is no basis for appeal— and unless DoJ comes up with a smoking gun showing fraud (no evidence exists), judge will order an immediate injunction.
Because the TRO expires 2 days after the Feb 12 preliminary injunction hearing, the judge is giving notice that he will issue a more-permanent decision on or before the TRO expires. He is moving damn fast while ensuring that the parties have the minimum notice and opportunity to make their arguments. Judge is being careful so there is no basis for appeal— and unless DoJ comes up with a smoking gun showing fraud (no evidence exists), judge will order an immediate injunction.
I appreciate your further explanations throughout the comments, Betsy. Thank you.